Applus+ around the world
Close Countries Panel
  • Belgium
  • Brazil
  • China
  • Czech Republic
  • France
  • Germany
  • India
  • Indonesia
  • Italy
  • Japan
  • Malaysia
  • México
  • Poland
  • Russia
  • Slovakia
  • South Africa
  • South Korea
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Taiwan
  • Thailand
  • Turkey
  • UK
  • United Kingdom
  • USA
Close Divisions Panel
Energy & Industry Division
Industrial and environmental inspection, vendor inspection, technical assistance, non-destructive testing (NDT) and technical staffing for all type of industries.
Logo RTD Logo VELOSI Logo NORCONTROL Logo Intec Logo K2
Logo Ingelog Logo JAN Logo Kiefer Logo Novotec Logo NRay
Logo PTJava Logo Skc Logo XRay Logo Qualitec
Laboratories Division
Multidisciplinary laboratories.Testing and engineering for product development. Conformity testing and product certification. SYSTEMS CERTIFICATION.
Logo Applus Laboratories Logo Applus Certification
Automotive Division
Statutory vehicle inspection services and emission & gas testing solutions worldwide.
Logo Applus Automotive Logo Applus ITVE Logo NCT Logo Applus Bilsyn Logo K1
Logo Technologies Logo ITVs Logo Riteve
IDIADA Division
Design, engineering, testing and homologation services for the automotive industry worldwide.
Logo Applus IDIADA

An Approach to Engineering Critical Assessment of Assets That Cannot Be Inline Inspected

Publication: 2018 12th International Pipeline Conference. Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity Date: September 24–28, 2018
In this paper, a holistic reliability-based approach was implemented for PG&E facility in response to PHMSA’s NPRM. According to §192.624, two integrity concerns were addressed: (1) failure pressure ratio relative to MAOP; (2) remaining life due to fatigue degradation. A case study was presented, in which the POF of hydrostatic test at 1.5×MAOP and the POF of remaining life less than 300 years were determined through Monte Carlo simulations. The variations of material strength, toughness, crack size, pressure cycle, and fatigue growth rate were taken into account.
Six different types of seam welds were investigated individually, including LF-ERW, HF-ERW, FW, SSAW, SMLS and Total that represents the overall. Crack size and the toughness of seam weld and pipe body were analyzed separately for each seam type. Probability distributions of normalized crack depth and length were established from ILI and in-ditch program. Probability distributions of material strength and toughness were established from the Kiefner mechanical testing database. The comparison of POFs attributed to hydrostatic test and fatigue failures is consistent with seam weld quality, considering crack size, material toughness and pipe manufacturing history.
Up to this point, two parts of the IVP effort shave been accomplished for pilot studies. One is NDE-based inference of design pressure for inadequate documentation and the other is ECA-based integrity assessment for PFP and fatigue life. Continuous progress is under way at PG&E to validate the inputs into the present reliability models, such as NDE inspection of their selected facility, more material testing by destructive and nondestructive methods, 3rdparty review, sensitivity analysis, and risk analysis development. As this approach is refined, additional threats can be incorporated into this framework. Outcomes of the research and application will be communicated with the public once they are available.
Access the full article here.
Site map